<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>daniel.haxx.se &#187; fedora</title>
	<atom:link href="http://daniel.haxx.se/blog/tag/fedora/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://daniel.haxx.se/blog</link>
	<description>Technology is life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:53:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Linux distros consolidate crypto libs</title>
		<link>http://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2009/01/11/linux-distros-consolidate-crypto-libs/</link>
		<comments>http://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2009/01/11/linux-distros-consolidate-crypto-libs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cURL and libcurl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fedora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daniel.haxx.se/blog/?p=503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For a while already, the Fedora distribution has fought battles, done lots of work and pushed for a consolidation of all packages that use crypto libs to completely go with Mozilla&#8217;s NSS.
Now it seems to be OpenSUSE&#8217;s turn. The discussion I link to here doesn&#8217;t make any definite conclusions but they seem to lean towards [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a while already, the <a href="http://fedoraproject.org/">Fedora</a> distribution has fought battles, done lots of work and pushed for a <a href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraCryptoConsolidation">consolidation</a> of all packages that use crypto libs to completely go with <a href="http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/pki/nss/">Mozilla&#8217;s NSS</a>.</p>
<p>Now it seems to be <a href="http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2009-01/msg00010.html">OpenSUSE&#8217;s turn</a>. The discussion I link to here doesn&#8217;t make any definite conclusions but they seem to lean towards NSS as well, claiming it has the most features. I wonder what they base that statement on &#8211; if there&#8217;s a public doc anywhere that state exactly which has what that makes any contender better than any other for them?</p>
<p>In the Fedora case it seems they&#8217;ve focused on the NSS <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FIPS_140">FIPS</a> license as the deciding factor but the license issue is also often brought up in this discussion.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve personally been pondering on writing some kind of unified crypto layer that would expose a single API to an application and handle the different libs as backends, pretty much the same way we do it internally in <a href="http://curl.haxx.se/libcurl/">libcurl</a> at the moment. It hasn&#8217;t taken off (or even been started) since I&#8217;ve not had the time nor energy for it yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2009/01/11/linux-distros-consolidate-crypto-libs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>curl with NSS and Fedora</title>
		<link>http://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2008/01/20/curl-with-nss-and-fedora/</link>
		<comments>http://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2008/01/20/curl-with-nss-and-fedora/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cURL and libcurl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fedora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libcurl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2008/01/20/curl-with-nss-and-fedora/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dave Jones blogged about his recent problems with curl on Fedora 8. It seems to be a problem somewhere in or related to the NSS library, that Fedora links curl to for SSL/TLS these days.
What I find a bit annoying with this situation, is that I&#8217;m using Debian unstable and I&#8217;m dist-upgrading fairly frequently to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://advogato.org/person/davej/diary/384.html">Dave Jones blogged</a> about his recent <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429175">problems with curl on Fedora 8</a>. It seems to be a problem somewhere in or related to the <a href="http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/pki/nss/">NSS library</a>, that Fedora links <a href="http://curl.haxx.se/">curl</a> to for SSL/TLS these days.<a href="http://curl.haxx.se/"><img src="http://daniel.haxx.se/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/curl-keywords300.jpg" alt="cURL" align="right" border="0" hspace="8" vspace="8" /></a></p>
<p>What I find a bit annoying with this situation, is that I&#8217;m using Debian unstable and I&#8217;m dist-upgrading fairly frequently to be able to run on the bleeding edge and yet I don&#8217;t have the equivalent NSS version  <a href="http://fedoraproject.org/">Fedora</a> has and what&#8217;s perhaps worse is: I don&#8217;t even know how to get it and build my own local version! Is Fedora using their own patched version of this (rhetorical question as I&#8217;m quite sure they are)? Is it possible to get that version or patch so that I can build it and test on my non-  Fedora development machine(s) ?</p>
<p>So, even though it really isn&#8217;t my problem or my issue to deal with, I couldn&#8217;t even try out his problem on my own!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2008/01/20/curl-with-nss-and-fedora/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

