I've previously mentioned the IETF httpstate working group several times, and here's some insights into one topic we're currently discussing:
HTTP Cookie: sort order
The current httpstate draft for the updated cookie spec says that cookies that are sent to a server with the Cookie: header in a HTTP request need to be sorted. They must be sorted primarily on path length and secondary on creation-time.
According to others on the http-state mailinglist, that's exactly what the major browsers do already and they thus think we should document that as that's how cookies work.
During these discussions I've learned that cookies with the same name that have been specified with different paths, will all be sent in the request and thus they need to be sent in a particular order and in fact even the original Netscape "spec" said so. I agree with this and I've also modified libcurl to act accordingly.
I hold the position that only cookies that have identical names need this treatment and that's what we must specify. Implementers however will most likely find that sorting all cookies at once will be easier.
The secondary sort key, the creation-time, is much more questionable. Why would the server care about that? How can they even rely on that?
Previously in this discussion (back in August 2009) I checked other open source cookie implementations to see how they deal with cookie sorting. I learned that perl's LWP does sort them based on path length but on nothing else. The following tools did no sorting at all: wget, curl, libsoup, pavuk, lftp and aria2. I have no doubts that we can find more if we would search for more implementations in more languages and environments.
Specifying that sorting is a MUST on path length will still keep LWP and the next curl version compliant. Specifying that they MUST sort on creation-date as well will then make all of these projects non-conforming.
One problem I have in the cookie discussion in general is that the (5?) major browsers pretty much all behave the same and while the 5 major browsers have almost 100% of the web browser market for users, we cannot then automatically assume that they have 100% of the HTTP client or cookie-using client market. We just don't know how many applications, tools and frameworks exist out there that aren't actually browsers but still are using cookies.
Of course, I want to say that creation-time sorting is pointless but I have nothing to back that up with. No numbers. The other side of the discussion has a bunch of browsers that sort like this already, but no numbers or evidence if servers rely on this or how many that do.
Can any reader of this find a site out there that depends on the cookie order being sorted on creation-date?
(Reminder: the charter for the HTTPSTATE working group is to document existing widely used practices. It is not to solve problems or to fix problems in the existing cookie protocol. We all know and acknowledge that cookies as they currently work are quite flawed and painful.)