In my mini-series of strange mails I receive, here’s another one:
Subject: Product Request
I am interested in purchasing some of your products, I will like to know
if youcan ship directly to SPAIN , I also want you to know my mode of
payment for this order is via Credit Card. Get back to me if you can ship
to that destination and also if you accept the payment type I indicated.
Kindly return this email with your price list of your products..
I assume I’ll never figure out what products he speaks of, or how on earth he ended up sending me this… I’ll admit I was tempted to make up some “interesting” products to offer.
Update: I was informed that this is probably “just” another online fraud attempt. How boring.
I’m going about my merry life and I use google every day.
Today Google decided I’m in China and redirects me to google.com.hk and it shows me all text in Chinese. It’s just another proof how silly it is trying to use the IP address to figure out location (or even worse trying to guess language based on IP address).
Click on the image to get it in its full glory.
I haven’t changed anything locally, but it seems Google has updated (broken) their database somehow.
Just to be perfectly sure my browser isn’t playing any tricks behind my back, I snooped up the headers sent in the HTTP request and there’s nothing notable:
GET /complete/search?output=firefox&client=firefox&hl=en-US&q=rockbox HTTP/1.1
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:188.8.131.52) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.6.13-1.fc13 Firefox/3.6.13
Cookie: PREF=ID=dc410 [truncated]
Luckily, I know about the URL “google.com/ncr” (No Country Redirect) so I can still use it, but not through my browser’s search box…
This is a full quote from a genuine email I received just moments ago:
What URL do I put in to get free apps ?plese tell me
Sent from my iPhone
I have no words to describe it further.
Okay it has been known for a while, but I just recently found out so I figure I should help put the light on a recent hilarious article published in the Red Hat Magazine: It is never correct to abbreviate â€œRed Hat Enterprise Linuxâ€ as â€œRHELâ€. (That’s actually not the correct title of the article, but the correct title is so ridiculously long I won’t paste it here since it’d take everyone’s breaths away.)
According to this article, RHEL is “never correct” as an abbrivation for Redhat Enterprise Linux – even though Google finds almost 2 million pages mentioning it, and the top search result it shows links to www.redhat.com/rhel/. Limiting the search to within redhat.com gives more than 52,000 hits.
Some people complicate matters more than others…